QA draft dataset — this prototype currently uses provisional scores for methodological review. Not final rankings, CMS or state government ratings, or measures of program performance.

Arkansas

Baseline year 2026 · Last checked 2026-09-04 · QA draft — not final ranking

Evidence Visibility Baseline
92.5 / 100

Measures the breadth of publicly available evidence located through this project’s framework. It does not measure health-system performance or program effectiveness.

Public Visibility Score
10 / 10
FY2026 federal award
$208,779,396
Evidence status: Strong public evidence

At a glance

Administering agency (as described in public evidence)
Arkansas RHTP FAQ identifies a state-led evaluation team; state RHTP site is official program hub
Public RHTP site
https://arkansasrhtp.com/
Plan availability
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Awards / funding visibility
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Community engagement evidence
Evidence status: Developing
Family / reproductive-health visibility
Evidence status: Established

Public Visibility Score

How easily a resident can find and understand basic information about the state’s RHTP activity. Public Visibility is separate from the evidence visibility baseline and does not indicate whether a state is performing well or poorly.

  • Plain-language explanation is findable2 / 2
  • FY2026 award amount is findable2 / 2
  • Administrator is identifiable2 / 2
  • Current activity/status is understandable2 / 2
  • Intended beneficiaries/communities are identifiable2 / 2
  • Participation/feedback/learn-more route is findable2 / 2

Weighted categories

Category scores reflect the amount and strength of publicly available evidence located for this project. A high score does not mean better health outcomes or program performance.

Funding & Fiscal Visibility

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Federal FY2026 award publicly identifiable

    CMS award list

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Public funding distribution/budget information

    Arkansas RHTP Resources: Year 1 Budget Narrative

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Administration & Governance

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Lead/admin structure publicly identifiable

    Arkansas RHTP FAQ identifies a state-led evaluation team; state RHTP site is official program hub

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Award decision/governance process described

    Arkansas RHTP FAQ identifies Governor's Office, DHS, DOH and DFA evaluation leadership

    2 / 2Clear evidence

State Commitments & Implementation Plan

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Current project narrative/plan publicly available

    Revised Project Narrative, Version 6 (3/31/2026)

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Initiatives/priorities clearly described

    HEART, PACT, RISE and THRIVE initiative resources

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Transparency & Public Information

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

20.0 of 20 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 20.

  • Dedicated public RHTP hub

    Arkansas RHTP Resources page

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Core documents/updates publicly accessible

    Resources page, FAQs, application and budget materials

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Public Understanding & Accessibility

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Plain-language program overview

    Healthy. Connected. Local. overview

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Current status/timelines understandable

    Funding/application FAQs explain award and implementation processes

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Community Voice & Engagement Evidence

Evidence status: Developing

5.0 of 10 points

2 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Evidence of plan-development/community outreach

    Public page documents pre-application outreach/technical assistance; quantitative engagement evidence not located in reviewed source

    1 / 2Partial evidence
  • Ongoing engagement/feedback mechanism visible

    Public FAQ/communications are visible; a distinct ongoing public feedback mechanism was not clearly documented

    1 / 2Partial evidence

Rural Reproductive Justice & Family Wellbeing Lens

Evidence status: Established

7.5 of 10 points

3 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Maternal/family health visible in RHTP priorities

    RHTP public materials reviewed emphasize access, prevention and technology; no dedicated maternal/family pillar located

    1 / 2Partial evidence
  • Equity/access needs explicitly visible

    Program emphasizes rural populations, access and community-based/local proposals

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Measurement & Accountability Readiness

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

5.0 of 5 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 5.

  • Performance/reporting expectations stated

    Quarterly evaluation and status reporting are required

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Accountability/measurement infrastructure described

    Quarterly reporting and aggregate outcomes are anticipated

    2 / 2Clear evidence