QA draft dataset — this prototype currently uses provisional scores for methodological review. Not final rankings, CMS or state government ratings, or measures of program performance.

Mississippi

Baseline year 2026 · Last checked 2026-09-04 · QA draft — not final ranking

Evidence Visibility Baseline
73.8 / 100

Measures the breadth of publicly available evidence located through this project’s framework. It does not measure health-system performance or program effectiveness.

Public Visibility Score
8.3 / 10
FY2026 federal award
$205,907,220
Evidence status: Established

At a glance

Administering agency (as described in public evidence)
RHTP Office is housed in Governor's Office; Project Director named
Public RHTP site
https://mississippirhtp.com/
Plan availability
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Awards / funding visibility
Evidence status: Developing
Community engagement evidence
Evidence status: Established
Family / reproductive-health visibility
Evidence status: Established

Public Visibility Score

How easily a resident can find and understand basic information about the state’s RHTP activity. Public Visibility is separate from the evidence visibility baseline and does not indicate whether a state is performing well or poorly.

  • Plain-language explanation is findable2 / 2
  • FY2026 award amount is findable2 / 2
  • Administrator is identifiable2 / 2
  • Current activity/status is understandable1 / 2
  • Intended beneficiaries/communities are identifiable2 / 2
  • Participation/feedback/learn-more route is findable1 / 2

Weighted categories

Category scores reflect the amount and strength of publicly available evidence located for this project. A high score does not mean better health outcomes or program performance.

Funding & Fiscal Visibility

Evidence status: Developing

7.5 of 15 points

2 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Federal FY2026 award publicly identifiable

    CMS and Governor award announcement

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Public subaward/funding distribution information

    No public subaward distribution located in sources reviewed

    0 / 2No public evidence located

Administration & Governance

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Lead/admin structure publicly identifiable

    RHTP Office is housed in Governor's Office; Project Director named

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Governance/oversight structure described

    RHTP Office coordinates implementation; federal procurement, monitoring and audit requirements apply

    2 / 2Clear evidence

State Commitments & Implementation Plan

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Approved plan/strategy publicly identifiable

    Governor announcement describes Mississippi's approved plan and initiatives

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Initiatives/priorities clearly described

    Assessment, care coordination, workforce, HIE, telehealth and infrastructure

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Transparency & Public Information

Evidence status: Established

15.0 of 20 points

3 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 20.

  • Dedicated public RHTP hub

    Mississippi RHTP Office/website launched April 29, 2026

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Core documents/updates publicly accessible

    Public site exists; full public document set was not established from reviewed sources

    1 / 2Partial evidence

Public Understanding & Accessibility

Evidence status: Developing

7.5 of 15 points

2 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Plain-language program overview

    Governor's announcement provides accessible program description

    1 / 2Partial evidence
  • Current status/timelines understandable

    Transition to implementation is stated; consolidated public timeline not located

    1 / 2Partial evidence

Community Voice & Engagement Evidence

Evidence status: Established

7.5 of 10 points

3 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Evidence of plan-development/community engagement

    Plan development included agencies, providers, community leaders, legislators and rural residents

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Ongoing engagement/feedback mechanism visible

    Stakeholder engagement is documented; ongoing mechanism not clearly located

    1 / 2Partial evidence

Rural Reproductive Justice & Family Wellbeing Lens

Evidence status: Established

7.5 of 10 points

3 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Maternal/family health visible

    Broad access/outcomes focus is visible; specific maternal/family initiative not clearly located

    1 / 2Partial evidence
  • Equity/access needs explicitly visible

    Rural access and reliable care are explicit goals

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Measurement & Accountability Readiness

Evidence status: Established

3.8 of 5 points

3 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 5.

  • Performance measures/baselines

    Public materials emphasize measurable impact; detailed indicator/baseline set not located

    1 / 2Partial evidence
  • Accountability structure/reporting

    RHTP Office explicitly tasked with accountability/results; federal monitoring and audit requirements

    2 / 2Clear evidence