QA draft dataset — this prototype currently uses provisional scores for methodological review. Not final rankings, CMS or state government ratings, or measures of program performance.

Missouri

Baseline year 2026 · Last checked 2026-09-04 · QA draft — not final ranking

Evidence Visibility Baseline
100 / 100

Measures the breadth of publicly available evidence located through this project’s framework. It does not measure health-system performance or program effectiveness.

Public Visibility Score
10 / 10
FY2026 federal award
$216,276,818
Evidence status: Strong public evidence

At a glance

Administering agency (as described in public evidence)
DSS/MO HealthNet and Rural Health Transformation Office
Public RHTP site
https://dss.mo.gov/mhd/rural-health
Plan availability
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Awards / funding visibility
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Community engagement evidence
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Family / reproductive-health visibility
Evidence status: Strong public evidence

Public Visibility Score

How easily a resident can find and understand basic information about the state’s RHTP activity. Public Visibility is separate from the evidence visibility baseline and does not indicate whether a state is performing well or poorly.

  • Plain-language explanation is findable2 / 2
  • FY2026 award amount is findable2 / 2
  • Administrator is identifiable2 / 2
  • Current activity/status is understandable2 / 2
  • Intended beneficiaries/communities are identifiable2 / 2
  • Participation/feedback/learn-more route is findable2 / 2

Weighted categories

Category scores reflect the amount and strength of publicly available evidence located for this project. A high score does not mean better health outcomes or program performance.

Funding & Fiscal Visibility

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Federal FY2026 award publicly identifiable

    Missouri DSS RHTP page

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Public funding distribution/budget information

    Year 1 Fund Distribution and budget narrative are publicly linked

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Administration & Governance

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Lead/admin structure publicly identifiable

    DSS/MO HealthNet and Rural Health Transformation Office

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Governance/implementation structure documented

    ToRCH Care hubs, hub anchors, procedures and program office are documented

    2 / 2Clear evidence

State Commitments & Implementation Plan

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Current plan/strategy publicly available

    RHTP application narrative and summary are publicly linked

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Initiatives/priorities clearly described

    ToRCH Care, maternal health, home visiting, MIH-CP, technology and other priorities

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Transparency & Public Information

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

20.0 of 20 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 20.

  • Dedicated public RHTP hub

    DSS RHTP page

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Core docs/updates publicly accessible

    Extensive timeline, webinars, applications, reports and press releases

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Public Understanding & Accessibility

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Plain-language program overview

    Stakeholder guide, FAQs and program overview

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Current status/timelines understandable

    Detailed program activity timeline and status table

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Community Voice & Engagement Evidence

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Evidence of community/stakeholder outreach

    Roadshows/webinars plus 41 Hub Anchor applications covering all 27 hub areas

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Ongoing engagement mechanism visible

    Stakeholder email updates, webinars, roadshows and hub structure

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Rural Reproductive Justice & Family Wellbeing Lens

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Maternal/family health visible

    Maternal remote monitoring, maternal health service line, home visiting and doula workforce

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Equity/access needs explicitly visible

    Rural/underserved access and community-specific hub approach

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Measurement & Accountability Readiness

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

5.0 of 5 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 5.

  • Performance/reporting expectations

    Annual report timeline and data/reporting requirements

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Accountability/measurement infrastructure

    Hub reporting, annual report and program data-capacity requirements

    2 / 2Clear evidence