QA draft dataset — this prototype currently uses provisional scores for methodological review. Not final rankings, CMS or state government ratings, or measures of program performance.

Tennessee

Baseline year 2026 · Last checked 2026-09-04 · QA draft — not final ranking

Evidence Visibility Baseline
97.5 / 100

Measures the breadth of publicly available evidence located through this project’s framework. It does not measure health-system performance or program effectiveness.

Public Visibility Score
10 / 10
FY2026 federal award
$206,888,882
Evidence status: Strong public evidence

At a glance

Administering agency (as described in public evidence)
Tennessee Department of Health administers/oversees RHTP
Public RHTP site
https://www.tn.gov/health/rural.html
Plan availability
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Awards / funding visibility
Evidence status: Strong public evidence
Community engagement evidence
Evidence status: Established
Family / reproductive-health visibility
Evidence status: Strong public evidence

Public Visibility Score

How easily a resident can find and understand basic information about the state’s RHTP activity. Public Visibility is separate from the evidence visibility baseline and does not indicate whether a state is performing well or poorly.

  • Plain-language explanation is findable2 / 2
  • FY2026 award amount is findable2 / 2
  • Administrator is identifiable2 / 2
  • Current activity/status is understandable2 / 2
  • Intended beneficiaries/communities are identifiable2 / 2
  • Participation/feedback/learn-more route is findable2 / 2

Weighted categories

Category scores reflect the amount and strength of publicly available evidence located for this project. A high score does not mean better health outcomes or program performance.

Funding & Fiscal Visibility

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Federal FY2026 award publicly identifiable

    CMS and TDH

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Public subaward/funding distribution information

    Sept. 3 announcement identifies 53 projects, counties and recipient types; award list is linked

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Administration & Governance

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Lead/admin structure publicly identifiable

    Tennessee Department of Health administers/oversees RHTP

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Governance/oversight structure documented

    TDH describes enterprise-scale administration and interagency collaboration; formal consulting contract also documents TDH responsibility

    2 / 2Clear evidence

State Commitments & Implementation Plan

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Current plan/strategy publicly available

    Full RHTP plan is linked

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Initiatives/priorities clearly described

    Five strategic pillars and competitive project lines are publicly listed

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Transparency & Public Information

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

20.0 of 20 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 20.

  • Dedicated public RHTP hub

    TDH Rural Health Access for Tennessee's Future

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Core docs/updates publicly accessible

    Plan, webinars, grants, RFPs, partner portal and newsroom

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Public Understanding & Accessibility

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

15.0 of 15 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 15.

  • Plain-language program overview

    Clear public framing and program explanations

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Current status/timelines understandable

    Grant windows, RFPs and Sept. 3 award announcement are public

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Community Voice & Engagement Evidence

Evidence status: Established

7.5 of 10 points

3 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Evidence of plan-development/community engagement

    Plan is described as locally led/collaborative; quantitative engagement evidence was not located in reviewed sources

    1 / 2Partial evidence
  • Ongoing engagement/feedback mechanism visible

    Partner portal, notifications, public contact channel and community-driven grants

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Rural Reproductive Justice & Family Wellbeing Lens

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

10.0 of 10 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 10.

  • Maternal/family health visible

    Maternal & Child Health is a major focus with maternal/infant goals and projects

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Equity/access needs explicitly visible

    Rural access, underserved areas and economically distressed counties are addressed

    2 / 2Clear evidence

Measurement & Accountability Readiness

Evidence status: Strong public evidence

5.0 of 5 points

4 of 4 applicable raw points earned, rescaled to a maximum of 5.

  • Performance measures/baselines

    Public 2031 goals include numeric targets

    2 / 2Clear evidence
  • Accountability/measurement infrastructure

    Public goals/targets and progress/reporting expectations support future measurement

    2 / 2Clear evidence